Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Importance of Rhetorical Theory in Communication - 2092 Words

Importance of Rhetorical Theory in Communication â€Å"What do you think about Rhetorical theory? Do you think, it’s something essential for our speaking, something we can’t do without?† – that was the start of my writing this essay, the first question that aroused in my mind, when I started it. Why should I write about the thing I even can’t feel, touch or taste. Is it really so important? Before reading some works and watching some videos in the light of Rhetorical theory, I couldn’t find in my head the answer to this question. So... I started to ask parents, friends and nobody could give me a definite answer. As a result the start of my work was much more than pessimistic. Unfortunately, I couldn’t attend your lectures on that subject, and†¦show more content†¦The audience or rather jury has to judge whether a past event was just or unjust, according or contrary to the law. In this species the right use of means of persuasion play a great role, I think. What I mean is tha t a lawyer should arrange and explain these past events in such a way, so that jury believes they’re just. So the level of knowing these means can sometimes turn a guilty person into an innocent one. And Hollywood provides us with a number of such examples. To my mind the best movies, where we can observe a brilliant usage of the Language are The Devil’s Advocate and Law Abiding Citizen. And lawyers sometimes use the third species of public speech that is epideictic. It praises or blames somebody; it tries to describe things or deeds of the respective person as honorable or shameful. While the deliberative and judicial species have their context in a controversial situation in which the listener has to decide in favor of one of two opposing parties, the third species does not aim at such a decision. Aristotle wrote his books centuries ago, but it’s still very up-to-date. The second theory was written in the 20th century. So it’s really very modern. Its author is language expert Kenneth Burke. Unlike Aristotle, whose means of persuasion were based only on verbal elements, Burke included nonverbal elements into his theory. Its main points are that any message in the language can be analyzed with the help of â€Å"DramatisticShow MoreRelatedEssentials Of Persuasion1248 Words   |  5 Pages Gerard A. Hauser covers a plethora of details on how to create a well-made persuasive argument in his book, an Introduction to Rhetorical Theory; however, he covered three specific essentials that are necessary for persuasion: the components logos, pathos and ethos; purposive discourse and rhetorical competence; identification. I will argue for each constituent, respectively, to prove that persuasion cannot thrive without the aforementioned essentials. The first essential of persuasion involvesRead MoreThe Pedagogical Theories For Teaching Writing And How Truth Can Be Achieved Through Different Perceptions943 Words   |  4 PagesIn this article, Berlin synthesizes four major pedagogical theories for teaching writing and how truth can be achieved through different perceptions. Neo-Aristolians (Classicists) use syllogistic reasoning to arrive at the truth because truth is logical and deductive. They see the audience as a force to be considered for shaping a message. In the classroom, truth is probabilistic and students need heuristics to discover the truth. Rhetoric allows the speaker to not only discover truth, but to convinceRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Abraham Lincoln s Second Inaugural Address1234 Words   |  5 PagesTiana Lanier Professor Lara Chapman Rhetorical Communication: A Theory of Civil Discourse July 7th, 2015 Rhetorical Discourse in Two Distinct Pieces of Work; Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address Emily Dickinson’s Success is Counted Sweetest Rhetoric is often denoted to as the art of persuasion. A set of linguistic traits and semantics used to evoke emotional responses from its intended audience, opening the floor for unanticipated influence by said audience. It would be an atrocity to ignoreRead MoreRhetorical Analysis : Rhetorical Rhetoric Essay1465 Words   |  6 Pagespiece of good writing requires close attention to a rhetorical situation, genre, and an audience. Writing occurs within a rhetorical situation and is made up of a speaker, a subject, an audience, and the context (genre). Each of these criteria builds on one another to make a piece of writing. The speaker or writer can choose what form of text or genre he/she wants the audience to get out of the context. Genre and the audience make up a rhetorical situation. The genre and audience both rely on eachRead MorePersuasive Synthesis Of Rhetorical Theory1482 Words   |  6 Pagesre-examined both my Persuasive Synthesis of Rhetorical Theory paper and cov er letter and resume, I’ve realized how many improvements I am capable of making on my own papers simply by reanalyzing them and making changes accordingly. Below, I will present my strengths and weaknesses, as well as revisit my ability to implement rhetorical theory into my writing. Persuasive Synthesis of Rhetorical Theory Upon re-reading my paper on the Persuasive Synthesis of Rhetorical Theory, I found that I had a knowledgeableRead MoreInterpersonal Relationships And Its Effects On The Family And Community822 Words   |  4 Pagespeople need them. In this quest, many theories, concepts, and axioms have been proposed to explain the complex notion of interpersonal relationships. This essay utilizes various theories and ideas to develop the ingredients of an effective interpersonal relationship. The theories will include the Symbolic Interaction, Expectancy Violations, Constructivism, Social Penetration, and Relational Dialectics Theory while the ideas will consist of non-verbal communication, self-concept, and trust and transparencyRead MoreWalter Fishers Narrative Paradigm Analysis727 Words   |  3 Pagesentice consumers. Walter Fisher created the narrative paradigm in 1984. Our book lists several communication theories under the heading of group and public communication; narrative paradigm is one of them. Fisher contends it is human nature to communicate using storytelling. Relating events in this manner helps us make decisions. Stories passed down from generation to generation teach the history and importance of culture or tradition. Stories allow people to relate to one another on a personal levelRead More Crisis Communications Essay1290 Words   |  6 PagesCrisis Communications Crisis communication is the most important aspect of external and internal organization communication. This type of communication ranges from image restoration campaigns to employee turnover. In the articles that I have analyzed, I discovered many examples of crisis communications and its importance. I will discuss the Bridgestone-Firestone Corporation’s image restoration campaign and explain Benoit’s theory of image restoration. Also, I will discuss how crisis communicationsRead MoreUniversal Language909 Words   |  4 Pagesparticipate learning of English and to acquire Communication Skills. But most of the rural people do not able to communicate freely during Campus Interviews. In order to face those problems, we need more practical training and we wants to study about Phonetics. SYNOPSIS: ââ€" ¡ Introduction ââ€" ¡ Language ââ€" ¡ Communication ââ€" ¡ Role of English ââ€" ¡ Technical English in Engineering ââ€" ¡ Key features ââ€" ¡ Course Objectives ââ€" ¡ Importance of technical English ââ€" ¡ Cons ââ€" ¡ NeedRead MoreFoundational Components of Traditional Rhetoric1919 Words   |  8 Pages As stated by Herrick, the beginning of the twentieth century looked bleak for rhetorical theory. During this time, logical positivism (i.e. the idea that scientific thinking would be able to solve all issues) had become rampant and became this sort of ideology (irrational or unexamined system of thinking) which led to rhetoric being deemed less important and inferior to the scientific method; however, as the twentieth century continued, science began to lose its hold by failing to provide solutions

Sunday, December 15, 2019

Gypsies, the Work Ethic and Hungarian Socialism Free Essays

In his work Socialism; Ideals, Ideologies and Local Practice, Chris Hann includes the text in which Michael Steward analyses the Gypsy responses to Hungarian social policy providing the image of the sources of popular resistance to the massive experiment in social engineering undertaken by the socialist governments of the Soviet bloc. The text focuses on the twenty five years period in which the Hungarian Socialist Workers’ Party led a vigorous campaign to assimilate the near half-million Gypsy population into the Magyar working class by trying to eliminate all traces of Gypsy lifestyle and behavior. In the author’s view there was there was an important plank formed in the social policy of the Hungarian regime. We will write a custom essay sample on Gypsies, the Work Ethic and Hungarian Socialism or any similar topic only for you Order Now This happened due to several reasons: the largest minority in Hungary lived shocking poverty conditions, the state was looking to renew its socialist pledge by modernization under social equality and the economic, social and cultural distinctiveness of the Gypsies. The result of this campaign was not the one intended because Gypsies were in 1985 as prominent in the Hungarian society as they were in 1960. Moreover, the state had managed to create conditions in which, in popular imagination at least, being a Gypsy seemed the most viable way to survive the privations and humiliations of a planned economy. The campaign to assimilate Gypsies in socialist Hungary The campaign lasted from 1961 to 1985 and it began with the decision that Gypsies were neither an ethnic group nor a nation. Cultural factors did not play a significant role in the reproduction of Gypsies and the attempts to turn them into a nation had been misguided. Gypsy nationalists programs slowed down the process of assimilation and their self-organization and expression were to be discouraged. The author states the Gypsies were characterized by a way of life marked out behavioral traits such as scavenging, begging, hustling, dealing and laziness, all being products of their exclusion from the society and the economy of the past. Gypsies had been sustained by the feudal division of labour in which they had played an important role but lost their social importance as capitalist industrialization displayed their skills as redundant. The Hungarian social government thought in the early 1960s that â€Å"the Gypsy problem† could be solved once and for all. How to cite Gypsies, the Work Ethic and Hungarian Socialism, Papers

Saturday, December 7, 2019

Federalism and the Supreme Court Essay Example For Students

Federalism and the Supreme Court Essay The powers delegated. . .to the federal government are few and defined. . . .The powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties and properties of the people and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. James Madison, The Federalist Papers #45 Since the establishment of judicial review in Marbury vs. Madison , the Supreme Court has been charged with the role of mediator. The Court arbitrates disputes between the individual and government, between the constitution and statuary law, and, within a constitutional framework, determines the allocation of power between states and the national government. The issue of federalism has occupied the Courts docket since its inception and continues to do so today. The Courts reaction to it has greatly altered over time as both the composition of the Court and the political mind-set of the country have shifted. The tenth amendment of the U.S. constitution reads: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. This amendment is the looking glass through which the issue of federalism is most often viewed. In the early decisions of the Court, with the notable exception of Marbury vs. Madison , the Marshall Court ruled heavily in favor of an expansive view of the tenth amendment and granted the states as much latitude as possible within the framework of the new constitution. Many of the Marshall Courts decisions were regarded with contempt since they ran contrary to the Hamiltonian flow of public opinion. Like a child beginning kindergarten, the government was just starting out, just beginning to explore new areas. The states were accustomed to their independence and their individual constitutions. The imposition of a federal government, although not entirely unwelcome, was at best uncomfortable. The Marshall Court was forced to reconcile the desire for state autonomy with the need for federal government. Marshall himself demonstrated the embodiment of this conflict as he was required to balance his personal Hamiltonian belief in a strong national government with the degree of federalism he thought the states could abide. The Courts of the 19th century took a decidedly pro-active role when it came to securing the states tenth amendment rights. In an 1824 opinion, Justice Johnson voiced the courts position when he characterized federalism as being . . . destructive to the harmony of states. Throughout the 19th century and into the beginning of the 20th century, the Court would maintain this new anti-federalist position, the development of which is commonly associated with the eruption of industry, the 1887 passage of the Interstate Commerce Clause, and the 1890 Sherman Anti-trust Act. The court spent the late half of the 19th century and the early half of the 20th delineating clear limits to congressional power as it concerned the Interstate Commerce Clause. The court ruled that the Congress could regulate use of interstate channels, regulate and protect interstate commerce, and regulate the activities that substantially effect interstate commerce. This ruling, however, was extremely vague and thus highly case specific. The Court felt that it needed to provide some limitation upon the vast powers the law would grant congress by reserving specific privileges for the states. It is possible to track this conservative trend through an examination of the Courts decisions beginning with an 1868 decision in which the Court found that the Commerce Clause did not cover the regulation of insurance companies. The Courts second ruling on the Clause can be considered a landmark case for the limitation it put upon the federal government. In the United States Vs. E.C. Knight Co. .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 , .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 .postImageUrl , .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 , .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250:hover , .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250:visited , .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250:active { border:0!important; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250:active , .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250 .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u4bcf8c8e4833c5682a054e1c8ad50250:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Culture Shock Essay , the Supreme Court found that the federal government could not use the commerce clause to regulate production, mining or manufacturing because all of these existed prior to the actual existence of commerce. This was a tremendous loss of revenue to the federal government, as the taxation of such items was no longer permitted. This is not to say, however, that the Supreme Courts restriction of federalism was detrimental to business. In fact, as can be seen by the decision .